LiteratureDB fully follows the bibliography styling
Old approach
Nickol doesn't want to follow the previous approach of proper annotation and transformation of the literatureDB into his favored styling guideline. This way is too work intensive for him. In the current solution of Jerome his guideline is not fullfilled. Even finding the errors is so work intensive for him that he decided not to do that anymore. If we want to follow that rout nonetheless we would have to check ourselves and compare with the attached styling file and the open tasks in Jira (both see below).
- https://gitlab.gwdg.de/farbenlehre/volltexte/-/blob/master/Lit/Lit_Fbl_Bln/fbl_bln_lit.xml
- https://gitlab.gwdg.de/farbenlehre/tei-to-solrxml/-/blob/master/gfl-indexer.xslt#L287
- 210405_Bibliographie_Darstellung.docx
- see also open tasks and documents in https://pm.sub.uni-goettingen.de/browse/GFL-215
He proposes a simpler approach.
The new approach is an xml output of Citavi which he corrected manually. The second two files show his wishes on how to ideally depict the file on the website
- https://gitlab.gwdg.de/farbenlehre/volltexte/-/blob/master/Lit/Lit_Fbl_Bln/fbl_bln_lit_citavi_TEST.xml
- 220202_Literatur_Test.docx
- 220204_Vorschlag_Lit_DB.docx
If he has to annotate the "Kapitälchen" and the italic parts, he can live without them. He would annotate the URLs himself though, if a single annotation for that is possible.
Tasks for simpler approach
-
Note the correct way to annotate the URLs(, Kapitälchen and italic) in the LiteratureDB XML file (if there is a schema for this file add it there otherwise just note it in a comment to this file) @mgoebel -
Inform Nickol about the way to annotate the URLs @rmraschkowski -
Implement the new Citavi based LiteratureDB xml file in the style of one of the two example files above (220202_Literatur_Test.docx or 220204_Vorschlag_Lit_DB.docx)